Why I authored this site


Why did I author this site? Because I get it!

By that I mean that I recognize the profound implication of the WEB, not just on the Internet, but on society itself. I first read Bush, then Engelbart, then Nelson. Then I went after McLuhan, along with the works of other theorists, such as Landow, and I see the WEB as the reality of their theories. As I became involved in WEB authoring I starting to think about how I, and others in the field went about it. I started to study the good sites I had encountered, and tried to define what made them good, both on a practical and theoretical level. What started as an informal contemplation grew into the formal study which resulted in this site. It is a labour of love, for the WEB has become my greatest love in computing.

Over the years I have had several transformational experiences in computing. The first was when I discovered programming, but it is the other three that are of greater interest here. In 1988 I discovered both multimedia and the Internet. Then, they were two distinct phenomena. Then in the Fall of 1991, I first encountered the WEB, logging on to the CERN site and using the line mode browser. At the time I didn't get it, I looked to Gopher and WAIS as the solutions to taming the Internet.

In the Summer of 1993, I saw my first demonstration of X-Windows Mosaic on a SUN workstation. The experience was profound, this was it, the coins of hypertext, multimedia, and the Internet that had been jingling in my head since 1988, fell together in a neat stack. This is what I wanted to be involved in. I felt sad that, at the time, you needed a UNIX workstation to run Mosaic, all I had then was a Classic II. That sadness turned to joy when I got my first copy of Mosaic for the Mac in the spring on 1994. In the Summer of 1994 I started to learn HTML, and was impressed by its power and simplicity.


WEB Paradigm Why. Media Theory. History and Prehistory Print Paradigm.
Multimedia Paradigm. Hypertext Paradigm. Docuverse Paradigm. Interactive Paradigm. Conclusions